Tri-axial compressive behavior of high-water material for deep underground spaces

Abstract

Attributed to its superior water-to-solid ratio and quick setting time, the high-water material is widely adopted in underground spaces as a cost-effective and environmentally friendly backfill material. To elucidate the bleeding mechanism of high-water material under the high confining pressure, a total of 57 tubular specimens were prepared and tested, critical parameters of which included the water-to-solid ratio, curing time, and lateral confinement pressure. Test results showed that no obvious cracks were observed from the surface of confined high-water material, which is different from that of unconfined high-water material, which featured shear cracks. Moreover, the volume of these confined high-water materials under compaction exhibited a continuous shrinkage associated with the water bleeding. The threshold values of the water bleeding are significantly affected by the water-to-solid ratio, followed by the confining pressure and curing time. When other parameters are constant, the higher confinement is requested for these specimens with a small water-to-solid ratio. Meanwhile, the mass of bleeding water increased with the lateral confinement, showing a quick increase at the initial stage. During the bleeding process, the free water stored in the pores was compacted, the evidence of which is the transformation of the hydration products (calcium aluminate hydrate) from its natural fibrous structure into the rod-shaped or dense agglomerate structures. These research outcomes provide an in-depth insight into the fundamental mechanics of the high-water material under the high lateral confinement when it is used for underground spaces.

Highlights


  • No visible crack was observed for the lateral-confined high-water material.

  • The relationship between confining stress and the circumferential strain of the confined high-water material was established.

  • The bleeding of free water from the high-water material was first theoretically investigated.


1 INTRODUCTION

With the gradual depletion of shallow coal resources, more and more coal mines encounter numerous challenges associated with the increased mining depth (Xie et al., 2015a, 2015b). The gob-side entry retaining technique is becoming an effective method for deep coal mines suffering from high stress and large deformation issues attributed to its specific layout of roadway (Deng et al., 2020; Xie et al., 2014). As the critical component of the gob-side entry retaining techniques, apart from sufficient strength and stiffness, the early strength of the standing support adjacent to the gob is also requested (Bai et al., 2004). Attributed to its high water-to-solid ratio, short solidification time, rapid growth of resistance, and easy-to-construct nature, the high-water material has been widely adopted as the backfill material for standing support in the gob-side entry retaining technique (Hou et al., 1995; Zhang et al., 2023)

Research and application of the high-water material in China can be traced back to the 1989s (Hua, 1996; Sun, 1993). The material mainly consists of two parts: one is composed of cement clinker with calcium aluminate, calcium sulfoaluminate (or calcium ferrite), while the main components of the other one are gypsum and lime. Furthermore, the super high-water material was developed, the main feature of which is that the volume of water can be 97% associated with the final strength of 0.66 MPa (Feng, 2009; Feng et al., 2010). The mechanical properties of the high-water material are sensitive to environmental factors such as temperature and pH value (Li, 2020; Yin et al., 2017; Zheng & Sun, 2000). The high-water material is prone to weathering, for which the loss of free water and the carbonation decomposition of calcium vanadate will lead to a decrease in the material's load-bearing capacity (Ding et al., 2011; Zhang, 2013; Zhou et al., 2019). In general, the high-water material is connected by a columnar ettringite network, and as the water-to-volume ratio increases, the dispersal degree of the ettringite structure becomes higher, leading to a weakening of the material strength and smaller crystal size (Peng et al., 2011; Ren et al., 2023). Different from other cementitious materials, the 7-day compressive strength of the high-water material can reach to 60%–90% of the ultimate strength, which suggests its early strength (Feng, 2009; Zhou, 2018). A large amount of studies have been conducted to investigate the basic physical and mechanical properties of the high-water material. The failure modes of the high-water material can be classified into the tensile, the shear, as well as the tensile–shear failures (Yiren et al., 2021). That is, the high-water material with a large water-to-solid ratio generally shows the “X” type conjugate shear failure, while the material with a small water content fails by the splitting mode (Diao et al., 2018). The sludge-doped modified high-water material exhibited the “Y” or “T” shaped damage characteristics either under the uniaxial loading or the graded cyclic loading (Zhang et al., 2017). With the increase of the water-to-solid ratio, the failure modes of the high-water material transform from the brittle failure to ductile failure associated with higher residual strength and load-bearing capacity (Li, 2019; Wang et al., 2001; Xiong et al., 2017). Other research also demonstrated that the uniaxial compressive strength of the high-water material increases with the amount of cement mixed and the age of the curing period (Jafari et al., 2020; Xu, 2022; Zhang et al., 2012; Zhang & Li, 2021). Different from that under uniaxial compression, the high-water material exhibits good incompressibility when under triaxial stress conditions. If the confining pressure is not large enough, the high-water material often fails due to the splitting cracks. As the confining pressure increases, the stress–strain curve of the specimen shows the ideal plastic mode associated with the shear dilation failure. Meanwhile, the loading capacity will be significantly enhanced (Ding et al., 2011; Hu et al., 2022; Li, 2019; Liu, 2017; Peng et al., 2011), which has often been verified in field practice (Li, 2016; Wu et al., 2023; Zhang, 2013).

As demonstrated by the aforementioned studies, there is no significant difference in terms of the failure modes between the high-water material and other grouts. Thus, extensive composite standing supports incorporating the exterior confinement device and the infilled high-water material were developed to achieve the high performance either in terms of strength or stiffness. Exampled by the composite columns made of the steel container and the high-water material, both the loading capacity and deformation ability of which have been well enhanced (Wang, 2016; Xia et al., 2018, 2022; Zhang, 2016; Zhang et al., 2015). Considering the heavy duty of the steel tube, the light weight composite material, namely, fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP), was introduced into underground mines to develop the innovative standing supports. Contributed to the linear elastic tensile behavior of the FRP composite, the lateral confinement applied to the infilled high-water material is under a specific tri-axial state. That is, the lateral confinement applied to the infilled material increased with axial deformation until the exterior FRP composite failed in tension. Characterized by a high strength-to-weight ratio, the lateral confinement provided by FRP composites can be several times greater than that provided by steel tubes. In this case, the authors' research group examined the water discharge and lamination cracking within the FRP tubular standing support (Zhao et al., 2022, 2023).

As an extension of previous research in terms of the FRP tubular standing support, the relationship between the macroscopic mechanical properties and microstructural evolution of the high-water material with variable water-to-solid ratios was investigated through the systematic triaxial compression tests incorporating the X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), the overburden porosity, as well as the permeability testing. Most importantly, the bleeding mechanism of the high-water material under the specific triaxial loading state was investigated. Furthermore, the findings offer robust theoretical support and practical engineering guidance for standing supports for underground spaces, where the high-water material will be confined by the increased lateral confinement.

2 EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM

2.1 Sample preparation

The high-water material used in the present research was provided by the Yangzhou Zhongkuang Building New Material Technology Co., Ltd. This two-component material has been widely used for underground mines, one component of which is made of calcium aluminate, calcium sulfoaluminate, and the other component is mainly gypsum and lime. It should be noted that the one-component slurry will not harden within 24 h before the mixture of the two components. According to GB/T 39336-2020 and GB/T 39337-2020 (Technical requirement of roadside bag filling for gob-side entry retaining with high-water material [GB/T 39336-2020]; Technical requirement of fully mechanized bag filling mining with superhigh-water material [GB/T 39337-2020]; Feng et al., 2010; Yan, 2004; Zhang & Li, 2021), 57 standard specimens with a diameter of 50 mm and a height of 100 mm were prepared with the recommended water-to-solid ratios (i.e., 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0), the preparation procedure of which is illustrated in Figure 1.

Details are in the caption following the image
Sample preparation process. (a) Stirring materials, (b) specimen pouring, (c) air drying, (d) demoulding, (e) sealing, and (f) static reaction.

As listed in Table 1, all these specimens were divided into two groups according to the loading modes (i.e., the uniaxial compression and tri-axial compression). It can be seen from Table 1 that there are three identical specimens prepared and tested to investigate the effects of the water-to-solid ratio (i.e., 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0) and the curing time (1, 3, 7, 14, and 28 days) as per GB/T 50081-2019 (Standard Test Method for Physical and Mechanical Properties of Concrete). For the triaxial compression tests, only one specimen was prepared to investigate the mechanical response of the high-water material with variable parameters. For ease of reference, each specimen was assigned a name consisting of three components: the Arabic numeral representing the loading mode, followed by the number indicating the water-to-solid ratio, and a final number distinguishing identical specimens from one another. For example, specimen 1-1.0-3 refers to the third specimen prepared for uniaxial compression testing at 7 days, with a water-to-solid ratio of 1.0.

Table 1. Specimen grouping and quantities.
Loading modes Specimen number Water-to-solid ratio Curing time (day) Number of specimens
Uniaxial compression 1-1.0-1 1.0 1 3
1-1.0-2 3 3
1-1.0-3 7 3
1-1.0-4 14 3
1-1.0-5 28 3
1-1.5-1 1.5 1 3
1-1.5-2 3 3
1-1.5-3 7 3
1-1.5-4 14 3
1-1.5-5 28 3
1-2.0-1 2.0 1 3
1-2.0-2 3 3
1-2.0-3 7 3
1-2.0-4 14 3
1-2.0-5 28 3
Triaxial compression 2-1.0-1 1.0 3 1
2-1.5-1 1.5 1 1
2-1.5-2,3,4,5,6,7 3 6
2-1.5-8 7 1
2-1.5-9 14 1
2-1.5-10 28 1
2-2.0-1 2.0 3 1

2.2 Experimental equipment

As illustrated in Figure 2, the MTS-E45.605 mine rock mechanics testing system was adopted for uniaxial compression tests, for which the DH3820Net static strain-testing system was applied to monitor the deformation during the whole test.

Details are in the caption following the image
MTS-E45.605 mine rock mechanics testing system.

Triaxial compression tests were performed on the GCTS RTR1000 rock mechanics integrated testing system, the test setup of which is illustrated in Figure 3.

Details are in the caption following the image
GCTS RTR1000 high-temperature high-pressure rock mechanics integrated testing system test and pipeline diagram.

A Sigma 300 high-resolution field-emission scanning electron microscope (Figure 4a) was applied to explore the microstructural changes of the high-water material under different loading states. Moreover, the AP-608 automatic porosity and permeability tester shown in Figure 4b was adopted to evaluate the porosity. The mineral component testing was conducted in the ARL9900 X-ray fluorescence spectrometer illustrated in Figure 4c.

Details are in the caption following the image
Microstructure testing equipment for high-water materials. (a) Sigma 300 high-resolution field emission scanning electron microscope, (b) AP-608 automatic porosity and permeability tester, and (c) ARL9900 X-ray fluorescence spectrometer.

2.3 Experimental plan

In the uniaxial compression tests, the loading rate of the specimen was set at 0.5 mm/min. For the triaxial compression tests, the main test group specimens were subjected to isotropic confining pressure loading to simulate the high-water material wrapped with different layers of the FRP composite. The lateral confinement provided by the FRP composite can be theoretically calculated using the following equation (Jiang & Teng, 2007):
(1)
where is the confining pressure generated by FRP confinement; is the elastic modulus of FRP; t is the thickness of FRP; is the maximum circumferential strain generated; and R is the radius of the specimen.

Based on the calculation results of Equation (1), it can be determined that the lateral confinement provided by FRP materials with an elastic modulus of 27 GPa, a layer thickness of 0.5 mm, and a tensile peak strain of 1.3% for 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 layers is approximately 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35 MPa, respectively. Therefore, the confining pressure gradients for the experimental groups were set at 35, 28, 21, 14, 7, and 0 MPa. The control group specimens were loaded to a confining pressure of 35 MPa at a loading rate of 5 MPa/min. During the testing process, circumferential strain and bleeding amount of water were monitored.

After the completion of the triaxial tests, specimens were extracted, and thin circular slices with diameters of 5–10 mm and thicknesses of 1–5 mm, as well as standard cylindrical specimens with diameters of 25 mm and heights of 50 mm, were obtained from the middle position along the axial direction of the specimens. Additionally, powder samples with particle sizes less than 200 mesh were prepared by grinding. The thin circular slices were observed under a Sigma300 high-resolution field emission scanning electron microscope to analyze the microstructural changes. The porosity and permeability of the cylindrical specimens were measured using an AP-608 automatic porosity permeability tester. Furthermore, the mineral composition content of the powder samples was analyzed using the ARL9900 X-ray fluorescence spectrometer. More detailed information about the experimental contents and plan can be seen in Figure 5.

Details are in the caption following the image
Experimental program.

3 MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF THE HIGH-WATER MATERIAL

3.1 Uniaxial compression tests

Figure 6 depicts the typical failure modes of the unconfined high-water material under uniaxial compression. It is apparent that these noticeable cracks generally developed from both ends toward the middle of the specimen. These specimens with shorter curing times and higher water-to-solid ratios usually exhibited the ductile deformation associated with the minor failures, while these samples with longer curing times and lower water-to-solid ratios featured the brittle failure. Taking the specimen with a curing time of 1 day for comparison, the cracks were mainly concentrated at the upper and lower ends, which can be seen in Figure 6. As the curing time increased, the number of cracks consequently increased and the locations of which developed from the middle height to the ends.

Details are in the caption following the image
Uniaxial experimental failure characteristics of high-water materials.

To further explore the failure modes of the unconfined high-water material, the failed specimens were manually split, and the inner surface of which is illustrated in Figure 7. It is interesting that there is no more obvious damage observed from the inner surface of the specimens, rather than limited pores, non-uniformly distributed within the surface.

Details are in the caption following the image
Uniaxial test section of a typical high-water material specimen. (a) Water-to-solid ratio of 1.0, (b) water-to-solid ratio of 1.5, and (c) water-to-solid ratio of 2.0.

The representative stress–strain curves of the high-water material under uniaxial compression are shown in Figure 8, for which all specimens shared the same curing time of 1 day. When the water-to-solid ratio of the high-water material increases from 0.5 to 1.0, the uniaxial compressive strength decreases to 3.08 and 1.81 MPa, respectively. When other parameters are constant, the peak strengths of the high-water material with a water-to-solid ratio of 1.0 are 4.71 MPa at 1 day, 5.61 MPa at 3 days, 5.88 MPa at 7 days, 6.00 MPa at 14 days, and 6.29 MPa at 28 days. These observations agree well with previous research on the influence of the water-to-powder ratio and curing time.

Details are in the caption following the image
Stress–strain curves of high-water materials under uniaxial compression tests. (a) Water-to-solid ratio of 1.0, (b) water-to-solid ratio of 1.5, and (c) water-to-solid ratio of 2.0.

According to GB/T 50081-2019, the error analysis was conducted in the present research to verify the consistency of test data. As listed in Table 2, the differences between the maximum value, minimum value, and the middle value of each set of parallel specimens are within the values of 15%, suggesting the consistency of the high-water material.

Table 2. Summary of the uniaxial compression test.
Specimen number Peak strengths (MPa) Error with the median value (%)
1 2 3 Minimum Maximum
1-1.0-1 4.39 4.71 5.01 6.79 6.37
1-1.0-2 4.79 5.61 5.72 14.62 1.96
1-1.0-3 5.36 5.88 6.55 8.84 11.39
1-1.0-4 5.73 6.00 6.78 4.50 13.0
1-1.0-5 5.62 6.29 6.92 10.65 10.02
1-1.5-1 2.96 3.08 3.16 3.90 2.60
1-1.5-2 3.42 3.86 3.89 11.40 0.78
1-1.5-3 3.86 4.13 4.68 6.54 13.32
1-1.5-4 4.12 4.44 5.04 7.21 13.51
1-1.5-5 4.30 4.65 4.92 7.53 5.81
1-2.0-1 1.70 1.81 1.95 6.08 7.74
1-2.0-2 2.19 2.28 2.58 3.95 13.16
1-2.0-3 2.30 2.49 2.56 7.63 2.81
1-2.0-4 2.60 2.97 3.04 12.46 2.36
1-2.0-5 2.67 2.93 3.15 8.87 7.51

3.2 Triaxial compression loading

Under the lateral constraint condition, the volume of the high-water material exhibited a continuous decrease within the loading process. The compressed shapes of the specimens under different confining pressures are shown in Figure 9a, for which there is no obvious cracks are observed on the surface of the specimens. Figure 9b depicts the internal sectional view of representative specimens, while Figure 9c,d shows the lateral expansion view of the specimens. Observation reveals that there were no cracks on the surface or inside of the high-water material specimens after loading.

Details are in the caption following the image
Triaxial compression shapes of high-water materials. (a) Typical specimens, (b) different views, (c) different locations, and (d) overall view.

Figure 10 shows the relationship between the water bleeding rate and the circumferential strain of the high-water material at the given confining pressure. It is obvious that the increased confining pressure results in the enlarged circumferential strain. Despite monitoring failures, the mechanical response pattern of the circumferential strain to the confining pressure could still be observed. The volume change exhibited a distinct trend of initial slow contraction, followed by rapid compression, and finally slow and sustained densification.

Details are in the caption following the image
Confining pressure-bleeding rate/circumferential strain curves. (a) Different water-to-solid ratios for 3 days and (b) water-to-solid ratio of 1.5 with different curing times.

The confining pressure-bleeding rate/circumferential strain relationships for high-water material specimens with different water-to-solid ratios and curing times of 3 days are shown in Figure 10a. For the specimen with a water-to-solid ratio of 1.0 (2-1.0-1), drainage began at 25.61 MPa with a flow rate of 0.024 mL/s (0.477 mL/MPa). Monitoring failed when the circumferential strain reached 4.27% at 13.11 MPa, and the flow rate decreased to 0.001 mL/s (0.013 mL/MPa) at 32.78 MPa. Slow drainage, along with particle outflow, continued until 35 MPa, resulting in 3.45 mL of water, with a water bleeding rate of 2.51%. For the specimen with a water-to-solid ratio of 1.5 (2-1.5-2), drainage started at 11.08 MPa with a flow rate of 0.051 mL/s (1.013 mL/MPa). Monitoring failed at 13.88 MPa after the circumferential strain reached 4.35%, and the flow rate decreased to 0.002 mL/s (0.042 mL/MPa) at 16.68 MPa, with 6.42 mL of water collected at 35 MPa, the water bleeding rate of which is 4.26%. In the case of the specimen with a water-to-solid ratio of 2.0 (2-2.0-1), drainage began at 7.01 MPa with a flow rate of 0.095 mL/s (1.896 mL/MPa). Monitoring failed when the circumferential strain reached 4.28% at 4.67 MPa, and the flow rate decreased to 0.003 mL/s (0.065 mL/MPa), collecting 18.60 mL of water at 35 MPa, with a water bleeding rate of 11.92%. The variation in the water-to-solid ratio affected (1) the pressure at which drainage began, (2) the flow rate, and (3) the final amount of water collected. Higher water-to-solid ratios required lower pressures to start draining, which resulted in greater final amounts of water being collected.

The confining pressure-bleeding rate/circumferential strain relationships for high-water material specimens with a water-to-solid ratio of 1.5 at different curing times are depicted in Figure 10b. For the specimen with a curing time of 1 day (2-1.5-1), drainage began at 9.01 MPa at a flow rate of 0.059 mL/s (1.193 mL/MPa). Monitoring failed at 8.70 MPa after the circumferential strain reached 4.27%, and the flow rate decreased to 0.004 mL/s (0.076 mL/MPa) at 13.29 MPa, with 6.76 mL of water collected when loaded to 35 MPa, with a water bleeding rate of 4.41%. For the specimen with a curing time of 3 days (2-1.5-2), drainage started at 11.08 MPa at a flow rate of 0.051 mL/s (1.013 mL/MPa). Monitoring failed at 13.88 MPa after the circumferential strain reached 4.35%, and the flow rate decreased to 0.002 mL/s (0.042 mL/MPa) at 16.68 MPa, with 6.42 mL of water collected when loaded to 35 MPa, with a water bleeding rate of 4.26%. For the specimen cured for 7 days (2-1.5-8), drainage began at 14.85 MPa with a flow rate of 0.041 mL/s (0.823 mL/MPa). Monitoring failed at 18.24 MPa after the circumferential strain reached 4.65%, and the flow rate decreased to 0.003 mL/s (0.057 mL/MPa) at 21.34 MPa, with 6.13 mL of water collected when loaded to 35 MPa, with a water bleeding rate of 4.17%. For the specimen cured for 14 days (2-1.5-9), drainage began at 16.78 MPa with a flow rate of 0.058 mL/s (0.7 mL/MPa). Monitoring failed at 12.78 MPa after the circumferential strain reached 4.24%, and the flow rate decreased to 0.003 mL/s (0.034 mL/MPa) at 24.77 MPa, with 5.94 mL of water collected when loaded to 35 MPa, with a water bleeding rate of 4.04%. For the specimen cured for 28 days (2-1.5-10), drainage began at 17.50 MPa with a flow rate of 0.035 mL/s (0.425 mL/MPa). Monitoring failed at 10.294 MPa after the circumferential strain reached 4.30%, and the flow rate decreased to 0.005 mL/s (0.060 mL/MPa) at 28.32 MPa, with 4.99 mL of water collected when loaded to 35 MPa, the water bleeding rate of which is 3.47%.

Increasing the curing time resulted in higher specimen drainage envelope pressures and initial flow rates. All the specimens exhibited slow drainage and particle outflow at 35 MPa.

Analysis of the loading process of the high-water material specimens revealed that various phenomena correspond to specific confining pressure conditions. As the curing time increased and the water-to-solid ratio decreased, the confining pressure required to initiate the water expulsion increased, whereas the flow rate decreased. In addition, changes in the flow rate occurred at higher confining pressure. The relationship curves of the curing time, water-to-solid ratio, and confining pressure at the critical points are shown in Figure 11.

Details are in the caption following the image
Relationship curves of curing time, water-to-solid ratio, and confining pressure at critical points. (a) Different water-to-solid ratios and (b) different curing times.

The relationship curves among the gradient confining pressure, water output, and circumferential strain for high-water materials under lateral constraints are shown in Figure 12. For specimens 2-1.5-2, 2-1.5-3, 2-1.5-4, 2-1.5-5, 2-1.5-6, and 2-1.5-7 (with a curing time of 3 days and a water-to-solid ratio of 1.5), the water outputs under confining pressures of 35, 28, 21, 14, 7, and 0 MPa were 6.75, 6.06, 5.78, 2.24, 0, and 0 mL, respectively. The peak values of circumferential strain were 4.35%, 4.29%, 4.26%, 4.24%, 3.98%, and 0, respectively. Analysis of the experimental data revealed that the water output increased with increasing confining pressure. When the confining pressure reached a certain threshold, the samples began to bleed water, and the flow rate initially increased rapidly and then decreased, indicating that under no lateral constraint and low confining pressure conditions, the high-water material samples did not expel water. In addition, the circumferential strain decreases significantly as the confining pressure decreases.

Details are in the caption following the image
Relationship curves of gradient confining pressure, bleeding rate, and circumferential strain for the high-water material under lateral constraint.

4 MICROSCOPIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE HIGH-WATER MATERIAL

4.1 Component testing

The components of high-water material specimens under different confining pressure conditions were analyzed using the ARL9900 X-ray fluorescence spectrometer. The obtained diffraction spectra are shown in Figure 13. By utilizing X-ray diffraction data processing and analysis software, the content of minerals such as ettringite, gypsum, and CaSO4·0.5H2O, CaO, and Al2O3 in the high-water material under various confining pressure conditions was determined. It was observed that under confining pressure loading conditions ranging from 0 to 35 MPa, the content of ettringite remained relatively constant. The results of the analysis are summarized in Table 3. The forms of these minerals in the high-water material specimens mainly exist in two forms: free water in the pore structure and structural water in the ettringite crystal structure. Based on the content analysis of ettringite, it can be concluded that the main source of bleeding in high-water materials under 0–35 MPa confining pressure conditions is the free water in the pore structure of the high-water rapid-setting material.

Details are in the caption following the image
X-ray diffraction spectra of the high-water material under different confining pressures.
Table 3. Critical results of X-ray diffraction testing.
Mineral Mineral contents (%)
0 MPa 7 MPa 14 MPa 21 MPa 28 MPa 35 MPa
Ettringite 86.1 86.3 85.2 88.1 87.0 87.5
Gypsum 4.5 3.6 4.9 1.9 5.4 4.4
CaSO4·0.5H2O, CaO, Al2O3 9.4 10.1 9.9 9.9 7.6 8.1

4.2 Microstructure testing

The microstructural characteristics of the mine-based high-water materials under lateral constraints are shown in Figure 14. A comparison of the microstructural characteristics of these materials under different test conditions revealed two main changes: the microscopic morphology and pore characteristics.

Details are in the caption following the image
Microstructure characteristics of high-water materials in mines under lateral constraint.

The extraction and classification of the microscopic morphology of ettringite are illustrated in Figure 15. The SEM analysis results in Figure 14 reveal that the microscopic morphology of ettringite exhibits four typical characteristics: loose fibrous (Morphology I), dense fibrous (Morphology II), rod-like (Morphology III), and dense granular (Morphology IV).

Details are in the caption following the image
Extraction and classification of the microscopic morphology of ettringite. (a) Extracting the microstructure of ettringite and (b) classification of the ettringite microstructure.

The microscopic morphological changes in high-water material specimens under 0–28 MPa confining pressure mainly involve the transformation of needle-like ettringite (Phase I) into clustered ettringite (Phase II) as the pores are compressed under the confining pressure. However, the microscopic structure remains unchanged. The morphological changes of ettringite under 21 and 28 MPa confining pressure conditions are not significant, indicating that the closure degree of the pores in the specimens has reached a relatively high level. Therefore, it is believed that during this stage, the reason for water bleeding of high-water materials under lateral constraint is that the pores of the high-water materials are compressed and tend to stabilize under the confining pressure, causing the free water in the pores to be squeezed out. This is manifested as continuous bleeding of the specimen, with a faster initial bleeding rate during loading, followed by a decrease in the bleeding rate and reaching a relatively stable state.

When the confining pressure is increased from 28 to 35 MPa, the analysis of the microscopic structure of high-water materials reveals that at this stage, the continuous clustering of needle-like ettringite (Phase I and Phase II) under the confining pressure continues. Some portions of the ettringite exhibit a rod-like structure (Phase III), and there are areas where the ettringite structures cluster into dense masses (Phase IV). At this stage, the specimen continues to bleed, but at a slower rate. The morphological changes in ettringite may lead to the conversion of some structural water into free water, which is then expelled under the influence of confining pressure. The possibility of the transformation of structural water in ettringite crystals into free water will be further explored in Section 4.2. Therefore, at this point, the reason for water bleeding of high-water materials under lateral constraint is that the free water in the pores is the main source of maintaining the bleeding phenomenon of high-water rapid-setting material specimens. There may be a conversion of some structural water in ettringite into free water, which, together with the residual free water in the pores, is expelled under the influence of the confining pressure.

4.3 Assessment of porosity and permeability

Owing to its small molecular diameter (which provides more precise measurements), helium gas was used to test the volume porosity and permeability of the high-water materials. Additionally, the results of the porosity and permeability tests are presented in Table 4. Notably, the volume porosity measurement of sample 2-1.5-4 was inaccurate owing to damage at the bottom during postprocessing.

Table 4. Results of porosity and permeability testing.
Specimen Porosity (%) Permeability (md) Water volume (mL) Bleeding rate (%)
2-1.0-1 37.53 1.447 3.45 2.51
2-1.5-1 55.44 7.616 6.76 4.41
2-1.5-2 55.38 7.883 6.42 4.26
2-1.5-3 55.24 7.187 6.06 4.02
2-1.5-4 53.56 6.724 5.78 3.84
2-1.5-5 55.22 8.168 2.24 1.49
2-1.5-6 56.01 8.431 0 0
2-1.5-7 58.13 10.854 0 0
2-1.5-8 52.12 5.625 6.13 4.17
2-1.5-9 51.36 5.597 5.35 3.71
2-1.5-10 51.21 5.672 4.99 3.47
2-2.0-1 57.42 10.265 18.60 11.92

A comparison of samples 2-1.0-1, 2-1.5-2, and 2-2.0-1 (curing time of 3 days), as shown in Figure 16a, and samples 2-1.5-1, 2-1.5-2, 2-1.5-8, 2-1.5-9, and 2-1.5-10 (water-to-solid ratio of 1.5), as shown in Figure 16b, reveals that the porosity, permeability, and water discharge of high-water materials increase with the water-to-solid ratio and decline with the curing time.

Details are in the caption following the image
Fitting relationship between the water-to-solid ratio/curing time and porosity/permeability/bleeding rate. (a) Different water-to-solid ratios and (b) different curing times.
Details are in the caption following the image
Relationship between confining pressure and porosity/permeability/bleeding rate.

When comparing samples 2-1.5-2, 2-1.5-3, 2-1.5-4, 2-1.5-5, 2-1.5-6, and 2-1.5-7 (with a curing time of 3 days and a water-to-solid ratio of 1.5), as depicted in Figure 17, the volume porosities of the high-water material samples under confining pressures of 35, 28, 21, 14, 7, and 0 MPa were found to be 55.38%, 55.24%, 53.56%, 55.22%, 56.01%, and 58.13%, respectively. Their surface porosity and permeability values were 48.30%, 52.31%, 53.86%, 54.81%, 55.36%, and 57.63% and 7.883, 7.187, 6.724, 8.168, 8.431, and 10.854 md, respectively. The bleeding rates recorded were 4.26%, 4.02%, 3.84%, 1.49%, 0, and 0, respectively. Analysis of the porosity of the high-water material samples under various lateral constraint conditions revealed that the porosity decreases with increasing confining pressure. Notably, when the confining pressure reached 21 MPa, the rate of decrease in the volume porosity decreased. This trend correlated with the observed bleeding rate, which started rapidly and then slowed during drainage, indicating a shift in the material's behavior under stress.

5 DISCUSSION ON THE BLEEDING MECHANISM

5.1 Law of free water bleeding

It is believed that the free water is internally and externally stored in the specimen. With the increase of the confining pressure, free water near the surface of the specimen gradually dissipates, and the extent of dehydration expands toward the interior. When the confining pressure reaches 21 MPa, free water originally near the surface has been bled out. It should be noted that there is still a certain amount of free water within the specimen, as shown in Figure 18a,b. As the confining pressure increased from 0 to 35 MPa, drainage began at 11.08 MPa with a flow rate of 0.051 mL/s. When the pressure increased to 16.68 MPa, the flow rate decreased to 0.002 mL/s. Correspondingly, the bleeding rates of the high-water material at the given confining pressures (i.e., 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35 MPa) are 0, 0, 1.49%, 3.84%, 4.02%, and 4.26%, respectively. Based on the amount and rate of water bleeding, the bleeding of free water can be divided into three stages: the air expulsion stage, the rapid bleeding stage, and the slow bleeding stage. In the present research, the threshold points for these three stages are 11.08 and 16.68 MPa, which can be seen in Figure 18c. That is, the pores within the internal structure of the high-water material are rapidly compressed at the initial stage. Once the air within the pores is expelled, the original free water begins to bleed out, with a relatively fast flow rate. As the confining pressure reaches a certain level, the porosity of the specimen stabilizes, and the proportion of original free water undergoes a significant decrease. Consequently, the flow rate slows down as the rate of pore closure decreases.

Details are in the caption following the image
Characteristics of free water bleeding under different confining pressure conditions. (a) Direction of water migration, (b) change of pore morphology, and (c) three stages of free water bleeding.

5.2 Mechanism of structural water removal

5.2.1 Classification and removal sequence of structural water in ettringite crystals

The structural water of the ettringite crystals (3CaO·Al2O3·3CaSO4·32H2O) within the high-water material can be classified into four groups: the interlayer water, the calcium polyhedron secondary coordinated water, the calcium polyhedron primary coordinated water, and the aluminum hydroxide ions (Al-OH), accounting for 45.9% of the ettringite crystals in mass (Jakob et al., 2019; Jiménez & Prieto, 2015). As illustrated in Figure 19, the positions of structural water within the ettringite crystal are different from each other (Hartman et al., 2006; Li & Qiao, 2023; Shimada & Young, 2001).

Details are in the caption following the image
Location of structural water in the ettringite crystal. (a) Center column of ettringite projected at (1102) and (b) (0001) projection.

When the ettringite is influenced by the external factors, both the interlayer water and calcium secondary coordinated water are removed in order of occupancy. Two interlayer H2O molecules may be adsorbed on the surface of the ettringite crystal or exist within defects in the crystal, making them easier to detach first. At this stage, the ettringite structure resembles a trigonal prism with two main vertices and two additional vertices. The H2O molecules at the main vertices act as primary coordinated water, connecting to the calcium atoms in a double-bonded form with shorter Ca–O bonds. The H2O molecules at the additional vertices serve as secondary coordinated water, linking to the calcium atoms in a single-bonded form with longer Ca–O bonds. After the removal of interlayer water, the 12 secondary coordinated water molecules in ettringite start to be removed, reducing the total crystal structural water from 30 H2O molecules to 18 H2O molecules. As previously indicated, the loss of calcium secondary coordinated water does not alter the crystal structure (Skoblinskaya & Krasilnikov, 1975a, 1975b). However, the coordination number of the calcium polyhedron decreases from 8 to 6, strengthening the connections between the calcium atom and two primary coordinated water molecules and four aluminum hydroxide ions (Al-OH). The primary coordinated water molecules shift closer to the calcium atom, enhancing the bonding strength of the aluminum octahedron's OH– bonds, ultimately transforming the calcium polyhedron from an undecahedron to a tetragonal bipyramid. Once all the calcium secondary coordinated water is removed, the subsequent dehydration sequence of ettringite does not continue in the order of occupancy. Instead, the ettringite first sheds some of the primary coordinated water from the calcium polyhedron, followed by the removal of aluminum hydroxide ions (Al-OH), with both types of water being removed simultaneously. After the removal of some primary coordinated water molecules, a significant change occurs in the coordination number of the calcium atom, causing distortion in the central column and disrupting the long-range order of the crystal structure.

5.2.2 Two hypotheses for the structural water removal


Hypothesis 1.The confining pressure resulted in the increased internal energy associated with the temperature rise, leading to the removal of structural water. Existing studies have verified that some external factors, such as temperature and humidity, will result in the change of structural water in ettringite crystals (Lan, 2004; Zeng et al., 2015) and the ettringite can remain stable when the temperature ranges from 40 to 50°C, with partial decomposition occurring when the temperature is higher than 60°C. Extensive decomposition of ettringite occurs when the temperature exceeds 80°C. For these specimens with small water-to-solid ratios, ettringite decomposes into monosulfate and hemihydrate gypsum at 50–110°C. As depicted in Equation (2), some structural water molecules were removed (Hall et al., 1996).


(2)


Based on the dehydration sequence and dehydration products of ettringite crystals, it is possible to further speculate on the changes in structural water of ettringite crystals under the influence of stress environments. In the present research, the water-to-solid ratios (1.0, 1.5, and 2.0) of the high-water material are relatively low. With the continuous increase of the confining pressure, the internal energy of the high-water material increased as well (Hall et al., 1996). As the temperature rises, the structural water in ettringite crystals is released, accompanied by the exudation of residual free water in the pores. During this process, monosulfate and hemihydrate gypsum are formed (Table 5).


Table 5. Type of hydrogen bond formed between water molecules.
Hydrogen bond type H-atom position O-atom position
Hw…Ow H-atoms of H2O molecules in the ettringite columns O-atoms of H2O molecules in the ettringite columns
Hw*…Ow H-atoms of H2O molecules in the ettringite channels O-atoms of H2O molecules in the ettringite columns
Hw…Ow* H-atoms of H2O molecules in the ettringite columns O-atoms of H2O molecules in the ettringite channels
Hw*…Ow* H-atoms of H2O molecules in the ettringite channels O-atoms of H2O molecules in the ettringite channels


Hypothesis 2.The compression of the high-water material results in the increased molecular potential energy, leading to the rupture of chemical bonds in the structure of ettringite crystals and resulting in the removal of structural water from the ettringite crystal. In the crystal structure of ettringite, there are four types of chemical bonds: hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, ionic–covalent bonds, and coordination covalent bonds (Li & Qiao, 2023). The types of hydrogen bonds can be divided into three parts: the basic structure, the water molecules, and the aluminum hydroxide groups. Among them, the hydrogen bonds formed between water molecules (Hw…Ow, Hw*…Ow, Hw…Ow*, Hw*…Ow*, as listed in Table 5) are unstable and prone to breakage in the crystal structure (Clark et al., 2008; Tararushkin et al., 2022). Van der Waals forces exist as weak intermolecular bonds between neutral water molecules in the ettringite crystal structure, connecting the two water molecules in the channels to the central column (Clark et al., 2008). Ionic–covalent bonds are mainly located in the central column formed by the aluminum octahedron and calcium polyhedron, while coordination covalent bonds exist in some sulfate tetrahedra, aluminum octahedra, and calcium polyhedra (Manzano et al., 2012). Under the action of the confining pressure, the volume of the high-water material is compressed, leading to a reduction in intermolecular distances below the equilibrium distance, which results in an increase in molecular potential energy (Deng, 2005). This increase in potential energy may cause the rupture of chemical bonds such as hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, ionic–covalent bonds, and coordination covalent bonds in the structure of ettringite crystals. Consequently, the structural water in the ettringite crystal is removed, along with the exudation of residual free water in the pores.


6 CONCLUSIONS

This study systematically investigated the mechanical behavior and bleeding mechanisms of the high-water material under the laterally constrained and unconstrained conditions, which is crucial for optimizing the formulation and engineering applications of high-water materials. The main conclusions obtained from this study are as follows:
  • 1.

    Different from these unconfined high-water material specimen that failed with noticeable cracks, no cracks are observed either on the surface or the inner body of the high-water material specimen.

  • 2.

    The volume of the high-water material exhibits a slow shrinkage at the initial stage, followed by rapid compression and continuous densification.

  • 3.

    With the increase in curing time and the decrease in the water-to-solid ratio, the threshold values for the lateral confining pressure corresponding to water bleeding increase as well.

  • 4.

    The water exudation rate of the high-water material increases with the confining pressure, exhibiting a phased behavior—initially rapid, followed by a gradual slowdown.

  • 5.

    The bleeding of free water of the high-water material under the triaxial state covers three stages, and the free water in the pores is the main source that sustains the phenomenon of water bleeding.

  • 6.

    The hydration products (such as ettringite) of the high-water material undergo a change in their microstructure, transitioning from the original fibrous structure to rod-shaped or dense cluster structures.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Honglin Liu, Jianbiao Bai, and Hongchao Zhao proposed the ideas and main contents of the research. Yang Xia, Zhongzong Cao, and Zizheng Zhang performed experimental research. Yang Xia and Zizheng Zhang performed the data analyses and wrote the manuscript. Honglin Liu, Jianbiao Bai, Yang Xia, and Hongchao Zhao revised the manuscript.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support provided by the Regional Fund of National Natural Science Foundation of China (52164011 and 52464008), Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (2022D01E31), Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region “Tianshan Talent Training” Program (2022TSYCCX0037, 2023TSYCJC0009, and 2023TSYCJC0095), Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Special Program for Key R&D Tasks (2022B01034, 2022B01051, and 2023B01010), and the Graduate student scientific research innovation projects in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (XJ2024G097).

    CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

    The authors declare no conflict of interest.

    Biographies

    • image

      Honglin Liu is a professor and doctoral supervisor at the School of Geology and Mining Engineering, Xinjiang University. In 2020, he obtained a doctoral degree in Mining Engineering from China University of Mining and Technology, and has been awarded titles such as “Tianshan Talent” and “Young Science and Technology Top Talent” in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. His main research direction is mining rock mechanics and rock control; Ecological and environmental protection mining of mineral resources; Theory and Technology of Stability Control for Tunnel Surrounding Rock.

    • image

      Dr. Hongchao Zhao is currently an Associate Professor at the School of Geology and Mining Engineering in Xinjiang University, China. He was previously trained at China University of Mining and Technology, and defended his thesis in 2021 with outstanding research outputs at the University of Wollongong, Australia. Dr. Zhao does devote himself and make significant advances on developing hybrid structures incorporating fiber-reinforced polymer composites for underground spaces and Infrastructure applications.