3.1 Uniaxial compression tests
Figure 6 depicts the typical failure modes of the unconfined high-water material under uniaxial compression. It is apparent that these noticeable cracks generally developed from both ends toward the middle of the specimen. These specimens with shorter curing times and higher water-to-solid ratios usually exhibited the ductile deformation associated with the minor failures, while these samples with longer curing times and lower water-to-solid ratios featured the brittle failure. Taking the specimen with a curing time of 1 day for comparison, the cracks were mainly concentrated at the upper and lower ends, which can be seen in Figure 6. As the curing time increased, the number of cracks consequently increased and the locations of which developed from the middle height to the ends.
Uniaxial experimental failure characteristics of high-water materials.
To further explore the failure modes of the unconfined high-water material, the failed specimens were manually split, and the inner surface of which is illustrated in Figure 7. It is interesting that there is no more obvious damage observed from the inner surface of the specimens, rather than limited pores, non-uniformly distributed within the surface.
Uniaxial test section of a typical high-water material specimen. (a) Water-to-solid ratio of 1.0, (b) water-to-solid ratio of 1.5, and (c) water-to-solid ratio of 2.0.
The representative stress–strain curves of the high-water material under uniaxial compression are shown in Figure 8, for which all specimens shared the same curing time of 1 day. When the water-to-solid ratio of the high-water material increases from 0.5 to 1.0, the uniaxial compressive strength decreases to 3.08 and 1.81 MPa, respectively. When other parameters are constant, the peak strengths of the high-water material with a water-to-solid ratio of 1.0 are 4.71 MPa at 1 day, 5.61 MPa at 3 days, 5.88 MPa at 7 days, 6.00 MPa at 14 days, and 6.29 MPa at 28 days. These observations agree well with previous research on the influence of the water-to-powder ratio and curing time.
Stress–strain curves of high-water materials under uniaxial compression tests. (a) Water-to-solid ratio of 1.0, (b) water-to-solid ratio of 1.5, and (c) water-to-solid ratio of 2.0.
According to GB/T 50081-2019, the error analysis was conducted in the present research to verify the consistency of test data. As listed in Table 2, the differences between the maximum value, minimum value, and the middle value of each set of parallel specimens are within the values of 15%, suggesting the consistency of the high-water material.
Table 2. Summary of the uniaxial compression test.
Specimen number |
Peak strengths (MPa) |
Error with the median value (%) |
1 |
2 |
3 |
Minimum |
Maximum |
1-1.0-1 |
4.39 |
4.71 |
5.01 |
6.79 |
6.37 |
1-1.0-2 |
4.79 |
5.61 |
5.72 |
14.62 |
1.96 |
1-1.0-3 |
5.36 |
5.88 |
6.55 |
8.84 |
11.39 |
1-1.0-4 |
5.73 |
6.00 |
6.78 |
4.50 |
13.0 |
1-1.0-5 |
5.62 |
6.29 |
6.92 |
10.65 |
10.02 |
1-1.5-1 |
2.96 |
3.08 |
3.16 |
3.90 |
2.60 |
1-1.5-2 |
3.42 |
3.86 |
3.89 |
11.40 |
0.78 |
1-1.5-3 |
3.86 |
4.13 |
4.68 |
6.54 |
13.32 |
1-1.5-4 |
4.12 |
4.44 |
5.04 |
7.21 |
13.51 |
1-1.5-5 |
4.30 |
4.65 |
4.92 |
7.53 |
5.81 |
1-2.0-1 |
1.70 |
1.81 |
1.95 |
6.08 |
7.74 |
1-2.0-2 |
2.19 |
2.28 |
2.58 |
3.95 |
13.16 |
1-2.0-3 |
2.30 |
2.49 |
2.56 |
7.63 |
2.81 |
1-2.0-4 |
2.60 |
2.97 |
3.04 |
12.46 |
2.36 |
1-2.0-5 |
2.67 |
2.93 |
3.15 |
8.87 |
7.51 |
3.2 Triaxial compression loading
Under the lateral constraint condition, the volume of the high-water material exhibited a continuous decrease within the loading process. The compressed shapes of the specimens under different confining pressures are shown in Figure 9a, for which there is no obvious cracks are observed on the surface of the specimens. Figure 9b depicts the internal sectional view of representative specimens, while Figure 9c,d shows the lateral expansion view of the specimens. Observation reveals that there were no cracks on the surface or inside of the high-water material specimens after loading.
Triaxial compression shapes of high-water materials. (a) Typical specimens, (b) different views, (c) different locations, and (d) overall view.
Figure 10 shows the relationship between the water bleeding rate and the circumferential strain of the high-water material at the given confining pressure. It is obvious that the increased confining pressure results in the enlarged circumferential strain. Despite monitoring failures, the mechanical response pattern of the circumferential strain to the confining pressure could still be observed. The volume change exhibited a distinct trend of initial slow contraction, followed by rapid compression, and finally slow and sustained densification.
Confining pressure-bleeding rate/circumferential strain curves. (a) Different water-to-solid ratios for 3 days and (b) water-to-solid ratio of 1.5 with different curing times.
The confining pressure-bleeding rate/circumferential strain relationships for high-water material specimens with different water-to-solid ratios and curing times of 3 days are shown in Figure 10a. For the specimen with a water-to-solid ratio of 1.0 (2-1.0-1), drainage began at 25.61 MPa with a flow rate of 0.024 mL/s (0.477 mL/MPa). Monitoring failed when the circumferential strain reached 4.27% at 13.11 MPa, and the flow rate decreased to 0.001 mL/s (0.013 mL/MPa) at 32.78 MPa. Slow drainage, along with particle outflow, continued until 35 MPa, resulting in 3.45 mL of water, with a water bleeding rate of 2.51%. For the specimen with a water-to-solid ratio of 1.5 (2-1.5-2), drainage started at 11.08 MPa with a flow rate of 0.051 mL/s (1.013 mL/MPa). Monitoring failed at 13.88 MPa after the circumferential strain reached 4.35%, and the flow rate decreased to 0.002 mL/s (0.042 mL/MPa) at 16.68 MPa, with 6.42 mL of water collected at 35 MPa, the water bleeding rate of which is 4.26%. In the case of the specimen with a water-to-solid ratio of 2.0 (2-2.0-1), drainage began at 7.01 MPa with a flow rate of 0.095 mL/s (1.896 mL/MPa). Monitoring failed when the circumferential strain reached 4.28% at 4.67 MPa, and the flow rate decreased to 0.003 mL/s (0.065 mL/MPa), collecting 18.60 mL of water at 35 MPa, with a water bleeding rate of 11.92%. The variation in the water-to-solid ratio affected (1) the pressure at which drainage began, (2) the flow rate, and (3) the final amount of water collected. Higher water-to-solid ratios required lower pressures to start draining, which resulted in greater final amounts of water being collected.
The confining pressure-bleeding rate/circumferential strain relationships for high-water material specimens with a water-to-solid ratio of 1.5 at different curing times are depicted in Figure 10b. For the specimen with a curing time of 1 day (2-1.5-1), drainage began at 9.01 MPa at a flow rate of 0.059 mL/s (1.193 mL/MPa). Monitoring failed at 8.70 MPa after the circumferential strain reached 4.27%, and the flow rate decreased to 0.004 mL/s (0.076 mL/MPa) at 13.29 MPa, with 6.76 mL of water collected when loaded to 35 MPa, with a water bleeding rate of 4.41%. For the specimen with a curing time of 3 days (2-1.5-2), drainage started at 11.08 MPa at a flow rate of 0.051 mL/s (1.013 mL/MPa). Monitoring failed at 13.88 MPa after the circumferential strain reached 4.35%, and the flow rate decreased to 0.002 mL/s (0.042 mL/MPa) at 16.68 MPa, with 6.42 mL of water collected when loaded to 35 MPa, with a water bleeding rate of 4.26%. For the specimen cured for 7 days (2-1.5-8), drainage began at 14.85 MPa with a flow rate of 0.041 mL/s (0.823 mL/MPa). Monitoring failed at 18.24 MPa after the circumferential strain reached 4.65%, and the flow rate decreased to 0.003 mL/s (0.057 mL/MPa) at 21.34 MPa, with 6.13 mL of water collected when loaded to 35 MPa, with a water bleeding rate of 4.17%. For the specimen cured for 14 days (2-1.5-9), drainage began at 16.78 MPa with a flow rate of 0.058 mL/s (0.7 mL/MPa). Monitoring failed at 12.78 MPa after the circumferential strain reached 4.24%, and the flow rate decreased to 0.003 mL/s (0.034 mL/MPa) at 24.77 MPa, with 5.94 mL of water collected when loaded to 35 MPa, with a water bleeding rate of 4.04%. For the specimen cured for 28 days (2-1.5-10), drainage began at 17.50 MPa with a flow rate of 0.035 mL/s (0.425 mL/MPa). Monitoring failed at 10.294 MPa after the circumferential strain reached 4.30%, and the flow rate decreased to 0.005 mL/s (0.060 mL/MPa) at 28.32 MPa, with 4.99 mL of water collected when loaded to 35 MPa, the water bleeding rate of which is 3.47%.
Increasing the curing time resulted in higher specimen drainage envelope pressures and initial flow rates. All the specimens exhibited slow drainage and particle outflow at 35 MPa.
Analysis of the loading process of the high-water material specimens revealed that various phenomena correspond to specific confining pressure conditions. As the curing time increased and the water-to-solid ratio decreased, the confining pressure required to initiate the water expulsion increased, whereas the flow rate decreased. In addition, changes in the flow rate occurred at higher confining pressure. The relationship curves of the curing time, water-to-solid ratio, and confining pressure at the critical points are shown in Figure 11.
Relationship curves of curing time, water-to-solid ratio, and confining pressure at critical points. (a) Different water-to-solid ratios and (b) different curing times.
The relationship curves among the gradient confining pressure, water output, and circumferential strain for high-water materials under lateral constraints are shown in Figure 12. For specimens 2-1.5-2, 2-1.5-3, 2-1.5-4, 2-1.5-5, 2-1.5-6, and 2-1.5-7 (with a curing time of 3 days and a water-to-solid ratio of 1.5), the water outputs under confining pressures of 35, 28, 21, 14, 7, and 0 MPa were 6.75, 6.06, 5.78, 2.24, 0, and 0 mL, respectively. The peak values of circumferential strain were 4.35%, 4.29%, 4.26%, 4.24%, 3.98%, and 0, respectively. Analysis of the experimental data revealed that the water output increased with increasing confining pressure. When the confining pressure reached a certain threshold, the samples began to bleed water, and the flow rate initially increased rapidly and then decreased, indicating that under no lateral constraint and low confining pressure conditions, the high-water material samples did not expel water. In addition, the circumferential strain decreases significantly as the confining pressure decreases.
Relationship curves of gradient confining pressure, bleeding rate, and circumferential strain for the high-water material under lateral constraint.