2.1 Research on the whole process of rock deformation and destruction
Natural rocks contain numerous fissures, joints, fractures, and other structural planes. Due to the existence of these anisotropic weak surfaces, when subjected to the action of external forces, their internal often continue to crack, extend, and penetrate along the weak surfaces. Ultimately, this leads to complete destabilization of the rocks (Liu, 2016; Zhang, 2016). Therefore, the destabilization damage of rocks is more complicated and is part of the problem of complex deformation and destruction (Sun et al., 2011).
2.1.1 Research on the whole process of fractured rock deformation and destruction
In the mining of the ore body and roadway excavation process, the ore body or roadway will produce numerous newborn fissures, new pores, and other defects within the surrounding rocks due to the influence of excavation. The integrity and continuity of the surrounding rocks around the ore body are severely affected by the presence of multiple complex structural surfaces (Fu et al., 2018; Haeri et al., 2014; Yin et al., 2014). Numerous studies have shown that the destructive destabilization of rocks in underground engineering is closely related to their weak structural surfaces such as internal fissures, joints, and cross-sections (Kang et al., 2014, 2016; Lin et al., 2017). As a result, many discussions have occurred on the laws of initiation, extension, and penetration of cracks in fissured rocks. Sagong et al. (2002) obtained the crack extension pattern of a defective specimen by compression testing and found that the crack pattern of a specimen with multiple defects was similar to that of a specimen with two defects. As shown in Figure 3a, two types of cracks are generated from the crack tip: wing cracks and secondary cracks. Wu et al. (2021) studied in depth the anchoring effect of anchors on fractured rock masses and their influence on crack extension. The presence of anchors can effectively limit the emergence and extension of tensile cracks and inhibit the emergence of shear cracks. As shown in Figure 3b, the crack types in the prefabricated fissure without the influence of anchors are diverse and similar to Figure 3a, in that wing cracks and secondary cracks dominate. Wu et al. (2020) analyzed the crack extension paths and fracture characteristics of orthogonal cross-fractured rocks with acoustic emission and surface strain measurement systems. This study also found that the cracks of fractured rock mainly spread in the form of wing or anti-wing extensions. Chen et al. (2022) investigated the impact of prefabricated fissure dimensions on the directional expansion behavior of rock Type-I fissures. They also examined the evolution patterns of acoustic emission and deformation field during crack propagation. Analysis of the acoustic emission trends indicates that enhancing the length of prefabricated fissures enhances the stability of directional crack extension, while widening these fissures leads to instability in the primary crack propagation path.
Distribution of cracks: (a) crack pattern and (b) types of cracks (modified after Sagong et al.,
2002 and Wu et al.,
2021).
We can find that all of the above research results are from the macroscopic point of view to explore the evolution law of cracks in fractured rocks because the destruction of fractured rocks is the result of damage evolution with continuous sprouting, extension, and penetration of cracks within them. However, the selection of observation methods is insufficient. Therefore, the digital image correlation (DIC) method based on the mesoscopic angle has been widely used in the research of rock crack extension in recent years. For example, Cen et al. (2014) investigated the extension mechanism of a fractured rock mass under dynamic loading with high strain rates. Based on the parallel bond model (PBM) (Zhang et al., 2012) of mesoscopic particles (Figure 4), three types of displacement patterns between mesoscopic particles and their forms are defined, and the crack extension is generalized into six basic modes. Gao et al. (2015) found that the fracture time, fracture toughness, and crack extension velocity of granite showed loading rate dependence by DIC techniques. Zhang, Xi, et al. (2021) determined mechanical characteristics such as crack initiation, strength, stress–strain, and damage morphology of granite based on the fracture mechanics theory to establish a mesoscopic particle flow model for granite containing prefabricated fissures. Based on the illustration in Figure 5a, it can be observed that the crack inclination angle is 30°. The deformation damage process in granite can be classified into four distinct stages, namely, crack closure, elasticity, crack stable extension, and crack unstable extension. Furthermore, Figure 5b displays the axial stress values that correspond to the crack's volumetric strain. The total volumetric strain and crack volumetric strain curves are utilized in this case to identify the crack initiation stress values of the rock samples. Wang et al. (2023) analyzed the relationship between abrupt changes in shear strain field and crack extension within open rocks by using precursory indices of full-field strain information in DIC technology. The results show that the changing patterns of strain field absolute standard deviation and the absolute variation coefficient were highly correlated with the rock fracture evolution. All the above experimental and research studies fully reflect the whole process of internal damage evolution of specimens using the DIC technique observation. However, the above studies lack a quantitative description of the evolution of the crack displacement field during rock fracture by the DIC technique. It can intuitively determine the fracture types of rocks with filled and unfilled fissures, overcoming the limitations of the traditional experience-based judgment of rock fracture types (Miao et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2023). Future research on the deformation damage of defective rocks should combine macroscopic and mesoscopic aspects, together revealing the whole process of rock deformation damage.
Sketch of the parallel bond model (modified after Zhang et al.,
2012).
Schematic diagram of the division of granite damage stages (
β = 30°) (modified after Zhang, Xi, et al.,
2021). (a) Strength damage and (b) crack volume strain.
2.1.2 Research on the whole process of rock with filled fissure deformation and destruction
In actual underground engineering, there will be fissures, joints, fractures, and other structural surfaces within the rocks. When the rock mass is disturbed, its weak surfaces are susceptible to deformation and fracture, and weak filling material can also occur within the joints. As a result, the bearing capacity and deformation characteristics of the filled fractured rock mass are significantly different from those of the unfilled fractured rock mass (Bai et al., 2020; Chang et al., 2022). As the filling gradually infiltrates into the surrounding fractured rock masses, it induces a significantly lower state of stress concentration near its weak face (Li, Wang, et al., 2011). Accordingly, fissure filling has become a crucial method to improve the physical–mechanical properties of the fissure weak surfaces and improve the integrity and carrying capacity of the broken surrounding rock in underground filling mining technology to be able to inhibit the rupture of the rock mass to some extent. Yin et al. (2016) conducted a study to examine the impact of different types of filling materials on the mechanical properties and crack growth evolution of fractured rocks. The researchers found that low-strength filling materials (Types 1–3) led to the development of tensile cracks from the tip of the fissure, which connected the left tip through the main fissure and the outer tip of the secondary fissure. Ultimately, this resulted in destabilization and damage to the sample. However, high-strength filling materials (Types 4 and 5) caused secondary cracks to sprout from the two tips of the primary cracks and extend through the upper and lower end surfaces of the sample, leading to destabilizing damage (Figure 6a). Based on the correlation method of digital images, Si et al. (2019) explored the effect of the consolidation time of the fillers on the damage process of fractured rocks from a mesoscopic perspective. They found that the crack forms dominating the damage were inconsistent under different consolidation times. Li, Du, et al. (2021) investigated the effects of fracture, filling, ligament length, and bridge angle on rock strength, fracture pattern, and permeability under hydraulically coupled conditions. They found that the influences of filling material on crack extension and coalescence behavior increased with decreasing rock bridge angle and increasing ligament length. Furthermore, sand filling usually has a greater impact on rock strength properties than mud filling (Figure 6b). Luo et al. (2021) conducted compression–shear experiments on rock specimens containing three different types of cracks. These cracks were either unfilled or filled with various materials. They used the discrete element method (DEM) to analyze the mechanical properties and damage patterns of the cracked rock specimens. The findings demonstrated that the mechanical properties of the specimens and the extent of crack propagation were primarily influenced by both the strength of the fillers and the inclination angle of the fissures. In a related investigation, Wu et al. (2023) focused on the phenomenon of tensile damage in naturally filled rock masses. They used 3D printing techniques to create rock materials with artificially filled fractures. They discovered that different filling conditions led to shifts in the location of the high-strain zone within the rock by digital imaging techniques. In addition, the displacement field of the filled rock transitioned from being continuous to discontinuous.
Sketches of the macroscopic failure modes: (a) experiment 1 and (b) experiment 2 (modified after Yin et al.,
2016 and Li, Du, et al.,
2021).
From the above research, we found that the mechanical properties of rock with filled fissures mainly hinge on the intensity of the filling materials and the inclination angle of the fissures. In terms of damage patterns, the mechanism of the fillers involves weakening the stresses on the defective rock, and the greater the reduction of shear stress, the more easily the filled rock samples will have tensile–shear damage. In contrast, when the strain is substantially reduced, the damage pattern of the filling rock samples is comparable to that of the intact rock samples.
The fillers trapped in the fissures cause the fractured rock to form a massive weak plane structure. Under the influence of stress paths, the filled fractured rocks are subjected to compaction, strength changes in the vicinity of the fissures, and the formation of precracks in the tips of the cracks. In addition, the presence of the fillers also results in a slight increase in the compressive strength of the rocks. Yuan et al. (2018) found that compared with rock samples without filling, rock samples with filling have higher peak strength. As the filling materials change, the peak intensity also changes (Figure 7). Under the influence of the filling bodies, the rock with filled fissures is dominated by wing cracks as a form of damage at the macroscopic level and shear damage at the mesoscopic level. Thus, under uniaxial compression conditions, the rock samples will first undergo a brief compression-dense phase before entering a linear-elastic phase, regardless of whether it is filled or unfilled. When the peak strength is reached, the pressure falls quickly, at which time the rock sample is seriously damaged, and most of its destruction is due to the combined effect of shearing and tensioning. Therefore, the crack generation law for them is that initially there are no micro-cracks. Subsequently, micro-cracks start to emerge at the contact part between the filled bodies and the joint surface as well as inside. Then, the amount of micro-cracks grew rapidly and gradually evolved to the internal rock samples. Finally, micro-cracks gradually develop through the formation of macro-cracks, resulting in destabilization of the rock samples' damage (Cui et al., 2023; Wang, Fu, Song, et al., 2020; Yin, 2023).
Stress–strain curves of marble with various filler materials (modified after Yuan et al.,
2018).
In summary, the current research on the deformation damage of fractured rocks has yielded a certain system. However, research on the deformation damage of rock with filled fissures is still in the development stage. Regardless of whether the fractured rock is filled or unfilled, most of the existing research is carried out in terms of the stress–strain curves obtained from the mechanical tests and the pattern of crack presentation under different fissure modes (Fan et al., 2018; Morgan et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2017). Nonetheless, with the application of acoustic emission, DIC methods, CT scanning, and other new auxiliary equipment, experimental research and analysis methods have improved. It is possible to study the whole process of rock deformation and destruction in detail from a microscopic perspective. We can use new theoretical methods and test technology to investigate the mesoscopic physical mechanism of rock deformation and destruction at a deeper level. As a result, it reflects the macro-mechanical properties of rocks through the mesoscopic perspective and constructs the relationship between macroscopic and mesoscopic aspects. This lays the foundation for continuous development and improvement of the mechanical mechanism of rock joints.
2.2 Mechanical properties of rocks with filled joints
In rock engineering, jointed rock is a prevalent and intricate medium. It has characteristics such as heterogeneity, anisotropy, and discontinuity. The deformation, strength, damage, and rheological properties of such rock significantly influence various aspects of rock engineering, including design, construction, operation, stabilization, and reinforcement strategies (Xu et al., 2005). However, in natural settings, most natural joints are filled joints. This phenomenon arises due to prolonged exposure of rock joints to weathering, erosion, and other physical effects, coupled with misalignment between joint walls. These factors lead to the accumulation of specific thicknesses of filling materials within the joints, thus giving rise to what are known as filled joints. As a result, the type and thickness of the filling medium emerge as critical factors that exert a significant influence on the mechanical characteristics of naturally filled jointed rocks (Sun, 1988; Yang, Wang, et al., 2016). This section summarizes the results of previous experiments on the mechanical properties of rock with filled defects, as shown in Table 1. The study focused on brittle materials, such as sandstone, granite, marble, and rock-like materials (gypsum, concrete, and resin), shaped as mainly cubes and cylinders. Most precast filled defects were fissures, holes, and combinations of defects. The filling materials were gypsum, cement, and resin. The number of defects in most of the studies was 0–3. The defect size was 0–30 mm, the width was 0.8–4.0 mm, and the inclination angle was 0°–90°.
Table 1. Experimental studies of previous rocks containing filled defects.
Rocks |
Filling materials |
D (mm) |
Prefabricated filling flaws |
References |
s |
n |
L (mm) |
β (°) |
Gypsum |
U |
76 × 32 × 152 |
F |
1 |
12.5 |
0–75 |
Wong et al. (2009) |
Gypsum |
U |
100 × 30 × 200 |
F |
3 |
12.7 |
30–60 |
Park and Bobet (2010) |
Sandstone |
U, G, C, R |
50 × 20 × 100 |
F |
1 |
25 |
0–90 |
Miao et al. (2018) |
Sandstone |
IF |
50 × 100 |
F |
1 |
20 |
0–90 |
Shan et al. (2021) |
Sandstone |
U, G |
80 × 30 × 160 |
I |
1 |
24 |
0–90 |
Zhou et al. (2021) |
Sandstone |
G |
50 × 100 |
F |
1 |
0–60 |
0–90 |
Gong et al. (2021) |
Sandstone |
U, MF, SF |
50 × 100 |
F |
1 |
20 |
0–90 |
Li, Du, et al. (2021) |
Sandstone |
U, C, R |
50 × 100 |
I |
2 |
20 |
- |
Cui et al. (2022) |
Sandstone |
U, G, CF |
70 × 35 × 140 |
F |
1 |
16 |
45 |
Yin et al. (2023) |
Sandstone |
R |
60 × 30 × 120 |
F |
1 |
24 |
45 |
Mohanty et al. (2023) |
Sandstone |
U, MF, SF |
50 × 100 |
F |
1 |
10 |
15–75 |
Du et al. (2023) |
Sandstone |
G |
50 × 100 |
I |
2 |
20 |
0–90 |
Li et al. (2024) |
Limestone |
C |
60 × 30 × 120 |
F |
1 |
20 |
0–90 |
Chang et al. (2022) |
Granite |
U |
60 × 30 × 120 |
F |
1, 2 |
10 |
30–90 |
Lee and Jeon (2011) |
Granite |
U |
76 × 25 × 152 |
F |
2 |
13 |
0–75 |
Morgan et al. (2013) |
Granite |
U, S, G, R |
80 × 20 × 160 |
C |
1 |
10 |
0–90 |
Wang, Zhang, et al. (2020) |
Granite |
C |
35 × 23 × 140 |
F |
1 |
0–30 |
45 |
Zhong et al. (2020) |
Granite |
U |
76 × 25 × 152 |
F |
2 |
12.5 |
60 |
Zafar et al. (2022) |
Marble |
U |
76 × 25 × 152 |
F |
1 |
12.5 |
0–75 |
Wong et al. (2009) |
Tuff |
U |
50 × 50 × 100 |
H |
1, 2 |
6–12 |
- |
Zhang et al. (2024) |
Rock-like |
U |
60 × 30 × 120 |
F |
2 |
12 |
35–75 |
Wong and Chau (1998) |
Rock-like |
U |
60 × 25 × 120 |
F |
3 |
12 |
45–65 |
Wong et al. (2001) |
Rock-like |
U |
60 × 120 |
F |
1, 2 |
20 |
50 |
Haeri et al. (2014) |
Rock-like |
U, G |
70 × 70 × 140 |
F |
1 |
15 |
15–75 |
Zhuang et al. (2014) |
Rock-like |
M |
50 × 100 |
F |
2 |
12 |
30–90 |
Tian et al. (2017) |
Rock-like |
M |
70 × 70 × 140 |
F |
2 |
16 |
45 |
Fu et al. (2018) |
Rock-like |
U, G, S |
70 × 35 × 140 |
F |
2 |
15 |
0–90 |
Zhuang et al. (2020) |
Rock-like |
U, G, C, R |
100 × 30 × 100 |
F |
3 |
15 |
0–90 |
Luo et al. (2021) |
Rock-like |
IF |
70 × 40 × 140 |
I |
1 |
20 |
0–90 |
Wang, Li, et al. (2022) |
Rock-like |
U, G, C |
50 × 8 × 90 |
I |
1 |
10 |
45 |
Wu et al. (2023) |
Note: Filling materials: U, unfilled; G, gypsum; C, cement; R, resin; IF, ice filled; MF, mud-filled; SF, sand-filled; CF, clay-filled; M, mica sheet; S, silicone. D: the dimension of the rock sample (mm); s: the shape of flaws (F, fissure, H, hole; C, combinations of fissure and hole; I, irregular fissure); n: the number of flaws; L: the length of defects (mm); β: the inclination of flaws (°).
Current studies on the mechanical properties of natural filled rock joints are generally conducted through laboratory experiments, theoretical analyses, and numerical simulations to explore the effects of different filling medium types, filling thicknesses, and prefabricated joint geometries on the strength of filled rock joints (Liu et al., 2014; Wang, Fu, Yang, 2020; Xu et al., 2018; Yu et al., 2023). First, the type of filling medium directly affects the mechanical properties of nodular rocks, and different types of filling mediums trigger different mechanical responses. Common types of filling medium, besides those shown in Table 1, include angular gravel and alteration minerals containing water, among others (Cotecchia et al., 2015; Tian et al., 2017; Wang, Zhang, et al., 2020). Second, the thickness of the filling medium shows a significant correlation with the contacting state of the upper and lower rock walls adjoining the joints. Consequently, this thickness variation influences the mechanical attributes of these joints. On the one hand, when the filling medium is thin, the interaction between the upper and lower joint walls during the stress process is affected by not just the wall-filling medium interaction but also the joint surface morphology. Under these circumstances, a connection exists between the strength of naturally filled joints, the thickness of the filling medium, and the morphology of the joint surface. Hence, the conventional theory about the strength of unaltered rock or soil joints is not applicable in this context. On the other hand, the direct contact between the upper and lower joint walls is missing when the filling medium is thin. At this time, the mechanical attributes of the joint are chiefly governed by the inherent properties of the filling medium. This influence is independent of the surface morphology and the strength of the joint walls. Consequently, we can draw upon pertinent theories from the domain of soil mechanics for research and discourse in this scenario (Chai et al., 2020; Li et al., 2022).
Under uniaxial compression conditions, the full stress–strain (σ–ε) curve can effectively reveal the mechanical and deformation characteristics of the rock with filled joints. As shown in Figure 8a (εd, εv, and ε1 are the radial, volumetric, and axial strains of the rock, respectively), the deformation of the rock with filled joints can be roughly categorized into five stages: (I) fracture pore compaction stage; (II) elastic deformation stage; (III) crack stable development stage; (IV) crack nonstable development stage; and (V) postrupture stage. In the early stage of loading, the original tensile structures or microfractures inside the rock gradually close and the rock is compacted, forming early nonlinear deformation. Also, the σ–ε curve is concave upward. In the elastic deformation stage, the σ–ε curve is approximately linear. In the crack stable development stage, the slope of the σ–ε curve tends to decrease with the increase in stress, and new microcracks are generated inside the rock and develop stably within the rock. With the increase in load, the σ–ε curve becomes convex upward, indicating that the cracks inside the specimen develop unstably until the specimen completely ruptures. In the postrupture stage, the internal structure of the specimen is damaged, but the specimen remains essentially intact. As shown in Figure 8b, the filling material and the fissure inclination angle significantly influence the mechanical properties of the specimens. The presence of filling material significantly increases the strength of the defective specimen compared with the unfilled material.
Typical mechanical properties of filled joint rocks. (a)
σ–
ε curves and (b) mechanical properties.
The deformation of rocks with filled joints depends not only on the intrinsic properties of the rock but also on the development of microcracks during rock deformation. The deformation and destruction of rocks with filled joints are accompanied by crack closure, sprouting, expansion, and penetration. The pre-peak deformation phase of the rock includes four important characteristic stress thresholds, that is, crack closure stress (σc), crack initiation stress (σi), crack damage stress (σd), and peak stress (σp), as shown in Figure 9. The volumetric strain and microcrack volumetric strain curves in Figure 9 show that the specimens undergo compression, followed by expansion. This is mainly because the microcracks inside the specimens are compressed and dense in the initial stage of loading. Further, after the elastic deformation stage, the cracks sprout, expand, and interact with each other, causing the rocks to expand and enlarge overall.
Stage delineation of the rock prepeak damage process, stress threshold determination, and prefabricated fissure cylindrical rock samples. (a) Tian et al. (
2017), (b) Shan et al. (
2021), (c) Gong et al. (
2021), (d) Li et al. (
2021), (e) Cui et al. (
2022), (f) Du et al. (
2023), (g) Li et al. (
2024).
In summary, the main characteristics of filled jointed rock samples are presented in Table 1, and Figures 8 and 9. Most of the prefabricated fissures studied so far are smooth, single fissures. However, the fractures in natural rock masses are mostly irregular, anisotropic, and discontinuous. Research on prefabricated fissures with rough surfaces needs improvement. Also, the effect of filling materials on the rocks with filled joints should be further explored. Previous data show that many types of filling materials exist, and the mechanical properties of the specimens are significantly affected by whether the fissures are filled or unfilled materials. In addition, the impact of the environment around the rock mass is not considered. This mass, in some cases, is subjected to acidic and alkaline conditions over a long period, which drastically affects the physical properties of both the filling material and the rock mass itself.
2.3 The influence of shear on filled rock joints
For jointed rock masses, shear is also an important factor in their stability. It is mainly affected by its size, roughness, strength, the presence or absence of fillers, and other properties and working conditions. Hence, experts both here and abroad have dedicated considerable efforts to investigating the shear mechanical attributes of unfilled joints. The findings from these investigations provide comprehensive insights into their mechanical characteristics and the progression of joint damage. Empirical equations for deformation and shear strength were finally obtained. Among them, Barton (1973) proposed the renowned joint roughness coefficient-–joint compressive strength (JRC-JCS) equation, established on the basis of an extensive series of direct shear tests. While this equation finds widespread implementation within engineering applications, its utility is somewhat curtailed due to the inherent subjectivity characterizing the parameters embedded within the equation itself. Esaki et al. (1999) and Olsson et al. (2001) verified and improved the above empirical Barton's equation utilizing coupled shear–seepage tests of rock joints in the laboratory. Subsequently, through experimental investigations, Grasselli (2006) introduced the initial peak shear strength equation, uniquely tied to the three-dimensional characteristics of the nodal surface morphology. This study advanced the research of nodal shear mechanical properties forward to a deeper level. Soon after, Tang et al. (2012) modified the equation based on several straight shear test results of Grasselli (2006) and its shape parameters. The new equation conforms to the Mohr–Coulomb friction law and the fitting results have smaller errors from the test values. Currently, research efforts in shear test studies about unaltered joints are centered on strength equations reliant upon three-dimensional morphology parameters, along with adjustments to the mechanical parameters encompassed by these equations (Tang et al., 2014; Xia et al., 2014; Yang, Rong, et al., 2016). Building upon the foundational equations, numerous researchers have devised shear strength models for unfilled coupled joints. These models serve to unveil the shear strength characteristics of jointed rocks more comprehensively (Shan et al., 2021; Tian et al., 2018).
Natural rock joints are usually not closed, and a definite thickness of the filling material will generate filled joints. The properties of filling materials play an essential role in controlling the joints' strength (Jiao et al., 2018, 2019; Xu, Lei, et al., 2019). Therefore, some researchers have investigated the peak shear strength of rocks with weak filler joints (Davies et al., 2000; Indraratna et al., 2005, 2008). In their study, Sun et al. (2014) investigated the peaking shear intensity of rock joints filled with cement paste using theoretical analyses and in-house straight shear experiments. They managed to derive the pattern of peaking shear intensity in these joints under varying filling degrees (Figure 10). The filling model can describe the change rule of peak shear strength of fractured rock joints after filling cement slurry. At the same time, it can reflect the different mechanical effects of filling cement slurry on hard rock and soft rock joints. Wu et al. (2019) conducted a straight-shear mechanical test study on the specimens of the filler–rock contact surface. Linear correlation conversion relationships were obtained for the friction angle and cohesion within the contact surface with the friction angle and cohesion within the isotropic ratio and age fillers, respectively. The established straight shear test setup is shown in Figure 11: Figure 11a shows the schematic diagram of the straight shear instrument. Granite is used as the rigid filler in this experiment, and the straight shear mode is shown in Figure 11b. Zhong et al. (2020) took into account the heterogeneity of filling materials and generated rock samples of filling mortar joints with initial fractures of different lengths (Figure 11c). The compression–shear fracture mechanism and initial fracture size of rock mass with fissure-filled joints under uniaxial compression are studied, and the influence of fracture mode and fracture energy on rock mass is revealed.
Relationships between peaking shear intensity and filling percentage of the cement-filled joint (modified after Sun et al.,
2014).
Filled fissure rock model and experimental setup (modified after Wu et al.,
2019; Zhong et al.,
2020). (a) The straight shear instrument, (b) the straight cutting mode, and (c) the filled rock.
From the above research, we can find avenues for future research on the shear intensity of filled rock joints: consideration of natural rock joints as the research subject, in-depth study of the theory of shear strength micro-mechanics, preparation of specimens with filled joints, shear effect, etc. Modeling shear strength is more consistent with naturally filled rock joints. Correspondingly, Xiao et al. (2020) prepared three sets of thin-layer filling rock joint specimens with Barton's standard profile line morphology characteristics and five different filling degrees. They investigated the shear expansion characteristics of thin-layer filled rock joints and found that the surface roughness of the joints is the key factor affecting their shear expansion characteristics. An analysis of the effects affecting the shear expansion characteristics of thin-layer filled rock joints is established, as shown in Figure 12. In a study conducted by Jiao et al. (2022), the impact of thickness-filled with sand on the intensity of shear in joints was examined. The researchers discovered that the filling significantly influences the mechanical properties of shear by regulating the damage mode of the joints. They also described the obtained trends in the cohesion and internal friction angle of the filled joints, as shown in Figure 13. Analysis of the data reveals a slight increase in the internal friction angle of the filled joints compared to the unfilled ones. Conversely, the cohesion of the filled joints shows a noticeable reduction, with the overall decrease in cohesion being higher than that of the internal friction angle. Another investigation by Wu, Zheng, et al. (2022) used PFC2D to examine how joint roughness and filler thickness affect the shear characteristics of joints. The numerical outcomes indicate that an increase in joint roughness and a decrease in filler thickness result in elevated shear stress and normal displacement in the joints.
Influencing factors of the dilation property of thinly infilled rock joints (modified after Xiao et al.,
2020).
Normalized values of cohesion and the internal friction angle (modified after Jiao et al.,
2022).
In summary, we found that most of the rock specimens in the aforementioned study were cut to obtain prefabricated fissures with smooth surface structures and a certain interface with the fillers. However, the surface structure of actual engineering rock fissures is highly complex. We should optimize the theoretical model and conduct new experiments with advanced observation instruments. Further, we should optimize the physical model to establish a rock model that is more consistent with natural rock joints. Ways to strengthen the adhesion between the fillers and the prefabricated fissure still need to be further explored when investigating the damage characteristics of rock with filled fissures. Additionally, the effects of multiple factors (e.g., fissure opening, length, roughness, surface area, etc.) on the mechanical properties of rock with filled fissures should be comprehensively considered based on theoretical knowledge and advanced equipment. Finally, we must combine macroscopic and microscopic analyses to fully understand the fracture damage mechanisms of defective rocks.